Re: GPL licenced Java application using non GPL jars (libraries)

[Alexander Terekhov]

David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> Uh, the GPL also has the backing of IBM.  

Yeah. Apart from contributing to just few GPL'd projects for strategic 
reasons, it is no secret that IBM treats [L]GPL'd code like a kind of 
toxic waste. The general rule is "seek for alternative". The preferred
license for IBM's own open source is the CPL.

regards,
alexander.