[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;) |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jun 2006 12:55:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
>>
>> > Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >> Why doesn't Daniel attack OpenBSD? Or Dragonfly BSD? Or FreeBSD?
>> >
>> > He doesn't attack the BSD because the BSD license terms don't contain
>> > any price-fixing provisions.
>>
>> But they still ruin his business prospects,
>
> And how do you know? Hint: he didn't sue Apple (BSD based Mac OS X
> which is marketed to consumers at a positive price). Anyway, it's
> not the probability of being ruined that is relevant to the
> Wallace's case. Competition is about grabbing as much of the market
> as possible and ruining (employing lawful means) competitors in the
> process. Wallace appears to believe that the BSD is lawful and that
> the GPL is unlawful. And you just keep misinterpreting his case and
> persistently fail to address his arguments.
I am in good company, as the court does just the same. The problem is
that Wallace's "case" needs different laws in order to actually be a
case. So you _have_ to "misinterpret" his case if you try matching it
to the _actual_ laws.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), (continued)
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/06/22
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/22
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/06/22
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/22
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/06/22
- Message not available
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/22
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/06/22
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/06/22
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/22
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/06/22
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;),
David Kastrup <=
- Message not available
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/22
- Message not available
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/22
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/06/22
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/22
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/06/22
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/22