[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 17:11:08 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Alexander Terekhov <> writes:

> David Kastrup wrote:
>> Alexander Terekhov <> writes:
>> > Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >> > telnet 80
>> >
>> > Now try telephone.
>> This is so going to convince a court that Wallace actually attempts
>> to sell something.
> Defendants in the Wallace's case have all the rights to challenge
> Wallace status as a competitor. That's what discovery stage in a
> lawsuit is all about.  Don't hope that Wallace is unprepared for
> discovery stage to establish (and defend) the facts he pleaded.

One does not "plead" facts.  Anyway, first Wallace needs to establish
a case before it makes sense checking the veracity of the purported
underlying facts.

> You're exhibiting total ignorance once again.

I assure you that I would not want to tread on your territory.

David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]