[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5

From: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
Subject: Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 21:04:20 +0100

Ter, 2006-07-04 às 19:17 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu:
> Q: Bzzzzt, but according to RMS, "intellectual property... is a mirage,
> which appears to have a coherent existence only because the term
> suggests it does." So bzzzzt, what the fuck ... !?
> A: Well, well, well. But according to one FTC commissioner (and an
> antitrust attorney),

Alex, please let me understand your reasoning:

Because a text is published by some law authority like FTC "is", or
Attoneries are, or even Judges... does that have to be taken as Official
in the Point of View of Law?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]