gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5


From: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
Subject: Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 10:48:17 +0100

Qua, 2006-07-05 às 11:16 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu:
> Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> > 
> > Ter, 2006-07-04 Ã s 19:17 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu:
> > > Q: Bzzzzt, but according to RMS, "intellectual property... is a mirage,
> > > which appears to have a coherent existence only because the term
> > > suggests it does." So bzzzzt, what the fuck ... !?
> > >
> > > A: Well, well, well. But according to one FTC commissioner (and an
> > > antitrust attorney),
> > 
> > Alex, please let me understand your reasoning:
> > 
> > Because a text is published by some law authority like FTC "is", or
> > Attoneries are, or even Judges... does that have to be taken as Official
> > in the Point of View of Law?
> 
> Consider:

(...)

Will you please answer my question, instead?
It's a simple 'yes' or 'no'...

Rui

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]