[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Jul 2006 10:28:21 +0200 |
Wei Mingzhi wrote:
>
> > It is a contract, but one doesn't enter into the GPL contract as long
> > as "copying, distribution, and modification" doesn't require a license.
> > For example, 17 USC 109 allows distribution and 17 USC 117 allows
> > copying and modification (adaptation).
>
> Read it carefully...
Read again what I wrote. Carefully.
>
> The 17 USC 117 is about private modifications or private copies, and GPL does
> _not_ actually put any restrictions on that. Read RMS' comments on Apple
> Public Source License for details. And you still cannot release that modified
> version without copyright holder's permission...
Yes, the GPL puts contractual restrictions on distribution of modified
versions.
>
> > Adaptations so prepared may be transferred only with the authorization
> > of the copyright owner.
>
> and the 17 USC 109 only talks about _physical_ media of the copyrighted
> material, it makes no sense to say it allows redistributions.
The copyright act says nothing about "redistributions". This word is
not used in the copyright act. And yes, the term distribution is about
material objects (aka "copies"). 17 USC 109 says that an owner of a
copy "lawfully made" is entitled to distribute it (rental and lease
of software aside for a moment) "WITHOUT THE AUTHORITY OF THE COPYRIGHT
OWNER". The phrase "lawfully made" means that the copy is not infringing,
either because it was made with the permission of the copyright owner
(express or implied license.. implied like in free downloads) or it
falls within one of the exceptions to the copyright owner's
reproduction rights.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Linus: "I am the one looking out for users' rights, not the FSF.", (continued)
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Linus: "I am the one looking out for users' rights, not the FSF.", Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/29
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Linus: "I am the one looking out for users' rights, not the FSF.", David Kastrup, 2006/07/29
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Linus: "I am the one looking out for users' rights, not the FSF.", Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/29
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- GPLv2 "was not worded with the same philosophy", Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/29
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- (Linus' "last word") GPLv2 is "been upheld in courts around the world" (and "is worth protecting"), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/29
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Linus, "DRM language is truly just a bug-fix, not a new feature", Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/29
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Linus, "DRM language is truly just a bug-fix, not a new feature", Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/29
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding, John Hasler, 2006/07/10
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/10
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding, Wei Mingzhi, 2006/07/10
- Message not available
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/11
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding, Wei Mingzhi, 2006/07/11
- Message not available
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/11