[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case
From: |
John Hasler |
Subject: |
Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Jul 2006 06:53:42 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov writes:
> ...persons affected or potentially affected by the terms tend to refer to
> the risk of viral license terms that reach out to infect their own,
> separately developed software...
There is, as you know very well, no such risk.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/20
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/20
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/20
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/22
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/22
- Message not available
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/24
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/07/24
- Message not available
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/24
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/07/24
- Message not available
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, John Hasler, 2006/07/24
- Message not available
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/25
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/07/25
- Message not available
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/26
Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/26