[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case
From: |
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra |
Subject: |
Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:24:58 +0100 |
Seg, 2006-07-24 às 13:45 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu:
> Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> [...]
> > So either you're misquoting, or Nimmer's
>
> It's neither. It's just your stupidity. Failure to perform according
> to the covenants stated in the GPL is not a copyright infringement. It
> is a contract breach, idiot.
It's not because you're not required to accept it. :)
Don't accept it and you're not even in a position to discuss wether it's
an argument or not. You simply have _no_ permission at all.
Of course your "mighty" slander can only make your "right".
Rui
signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/20
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/20
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/20
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/22
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/22
- Message not available
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/24
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case,
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <=
- Message not available
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/24
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/07/24
- Message not available
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, John Hasler, 2006/07/24
- Message not available
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/25
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/07/25
- Message not available
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/26
Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/26