[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:35:09 +0200

Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> Seg, 2006-07-24 Ã s 20:08 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu:
> > > Of course your "mighty" slander can only make your "right".
> >
> > Slander? There's a whole bunch of evidence that you both (RMS and mini-
> > RMS) are lunatics... kind of software taliban. And GNU-nazis.
> You loose:'s_law

It's imposible to lose because there's no debate. One just can't argue 
with GNUtians. It's like trying to prove a negative. GNUtians postulate 
that pigs can fly and then expect you to disprove their claims. Here's 
Judge Newman of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal 
Circuit on license: "A license is governed by the laws of contract. See 
McCoy v. Mitsuboshi Cutlery, Inc., 67 F.3d 917, 920, 36 USPQ2d 1289, 
1291 (Fed. Cir. 1995) ("Whether express or implied, a license is a 
contract governed by ordinary principles of state contract law.")." 
Jazz Photo v. ITC, (CAFC) 264 F.3d 1094, August 21, 2001.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]