Re: Combining GPL and commercial license

[Alexander Terekhov]

Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> 
> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
> > Yes, and he quite clearly stated that their product as a whole was
> > supposed to have a GPLed component, ergo be a combined work derived
> > from (among others) the GPLed piece.
> 
> His product as whole is NOT a derivative work, idiot.
> 
> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20040207022922296
> 
> SCO:
> 
> 30. The various identified versions of UNIX are sometimes referred
> to as UNIX “flavors.” All commercial UNIX “flavors” in use today are
> modifications of, and derivative works based on, the UNIX System V
> Technology (“System V Technology”).
> 
> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2004040118450269
> 
> IBM:
> 
> 30. Denies the averments of paragrpah 30 as they relate to IBM and
> Sequent or to AIX and Dynix/ptx, except states that IBM develps,
> manufactures and markets a product under the name "Dynix/ptx".

Err. Buggy groklaw trascriber. 

http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/IBM-126-2.pdf

30. Denies the averments of paragraph 30 as they relate to IBM and 
Sequent or to AIX or Dynix/ptx, except states that IBM develops, 
manufactures and markets a product under the trade name "AIX" and 
Sequent developed, manufactured and marketed a product under the 
name "Dynix/ptx". 

regards,
alexander.