[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What is source ?
From: |
Tim Smith |
Subject: |
Re: What is source ? |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Aug 2006 21:27:50 -0000 |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.7.4 (OS/2 for ENIAC) |
In article <85d5bd61wr.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>, David Kastrup wrote:
> Competitors might try to sue for misleading advertising, but that's about
> it. There are no warranties, implied or otherwise, coming with GPLed
> software. The only person who has standing to sue for non-compliance is
> the copyright holder himself. As a recipient of misleadingly
> GPL-labelled, or incomplete software, you can't sue your source for
> compliance. You can only report this to the copyright holder, and he
> might consider action.
Well, there will be no cause of action under copyright law, but there might
be under contract. When party X promises something, and party Y
detrimentally relies on that, then the doctrine of promissory estoppel can
make it so there is effectively an enforcable contract.
--
--Tim Smith
- What is source ?, Vincent Rivière, 2006/08/06
- Re: What is source ?, David Kastrup, 2006/08/06
- Re: What is source ?, Byron A Jeff, 2006/08/06
- Re: What is source ?, Dave (from the UK), 2006/08/06
- Re: What is source ?, John Hasler, 2006/08/06
- Re: What is source ?, David Kastrup, 2006/08/06
- Re: What is source ?,
Tim Smith <=
- Re: What is source ?, David Kastrup, 2006/08/20
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/21
- Re: What is source ?, David Kastrup, 2006/08/21
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/21
- Re: What is source ?, David Kastrup, 2006/08/21
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/21
- Re: What is source ?, David Kastrup, 2006/08/21
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/21
- Re: What is source ?, David Golden, 2006/08/21
- Re: What is source ?, Wei Mingzhi, 2006/08/22