[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:05:08 +0200

David Kastrup wrote:
> > "And a copy made under a license retains the license obligations."
> >
> > is quite telling.
> Read a dictionary.  "Keep in place" is perfectly acceptable definition

Which place, dak? And what puts it in place to begin with? And recall 
that your GNUtian authority comrade moron Moglen postulates that "a 
license is a unilateral permission, not an obligation." So did you 
check it with him? Party line, and all that, you know.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]