Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Linus' gang: "abandon the current GPLv3 process before it becomes too late"

[Alexander Terekhov]

David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> Stallman's work, later enhanced by other parties but kept (c) FSF all
> the time.

(C) FSF doesn't mean that the code was written by the FSF, retard. Folks 
assign their 100% original code to the FSF on regular basis. Then comes 
FSF's crackpot derivation theory (e.g. gpl-faq.html#OOPLang) and humble 
suggestions along the lines of

http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/assignunisrule.html

-----
Once code is written and placed under the GPL, any code based on that 
code and distributed will also placed under the GPL. Thus, there is 
nothing a university could do with a developer's code if it is based 
on previously GPL'd code anyway. There is no good reason NOT to assign 
code to the FSF.
-----

http://www.google.com/search?q=jacobson+FSF yields "From: "Jonas 
Jacobson via RT" <copyright-clerk at fsf dot org>" and "FSF Assignment 
Administrator Jonas Jacobson".

Man oh man.

regards,
alexander.