[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: More GPL questions

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: More GPL questions
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:25:26 +0200

"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote:
>        Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are
>        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Linking == modification.
>        These requirements apply to the modified work as a whole.  If
>        identifiable sections of that work are not derived from the
>        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Linking == deriviate work.

Your GPL-FAQing GNUish crackpot "deriviate" theory is just an evidence 
that can be really helpful in the context of insanity defense for 
GNUtians outside the GNU Republic.

>        Program, and can be reasonably considered independent and separate
>                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Linking == depends on another work to function.

It's interoperability (what GNU Reichsminister für Volksaufklärung und 
Propaganda calls "interpenetration"), retard. 


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]