[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim
|
From: |
Lee Hollaar |
|
Subject: |
Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim |
|
Date: |
Thu, 9 Nov 2006 11:57:40 -0700 (MST) |
In article <45536D8E.4C60D8C5@web.de> terekhov@web.de writes:
>--------------------
>In the
>United States Court of Appeals
>For the Seventh Circuit
>____________
>No. 06-2454
>DANIEL WALLACE,
>Plaintiff-Appellant,
>v.
>INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES
>CORPORATION; RED HAT, INC.; and
>NOVELL, INC.,
>Defendants-Appellees.
The short version can be summed up by this sentence from the opinion:
"This does not assist Williams, however, because his legal theory is
faulty substantively."
Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim,
Lee Hollaar <=
Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/09
Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/09
Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/09
Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/11/10
Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/10
Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/10