Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim

[Richard Tobin]

In article <455856DE.436AE45D@web.de>,
Alexander Terekhov  <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
[more deliberate misinformation deleted]

Tell you what, why don't you get a copy of the GNU Emacs source,
decline to accept the GPL, and start distributing modified copies of
it with a licence fee.  By your theory this would be completely legal,
since it's agreeing to the GPL that takes away your right to do it.

Of course, you'd probably get one of those brain-dead judges there seem
to be so many of, so perhaps you'd better not risk it.

-- Richard
-- 
"Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters
in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963.