[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gpl licensing
From: |
Richard Tobin |
Subject: |
Re: gpl licensing |
Date: |
4 Dec 2006 17:13:47 GMT |
In article <45741E2F.BA6C23AB@web.de>,
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
>Property is property, that is to say, it belongs to someone
>who has the right to exclude others from using it without his or her
>consent.
>
>Intellectual property is property.
So why are you so concerned to find a legal basis to prevent people
who write software from licensing it as they wish?
-- Richard
--
"Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters
in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963.
- Re: gpl licensing, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/06
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/04
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing,
Richard Tobin <=
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/03