[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gpl licensing
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: gpl licensing |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Dec 2006 18:49:29 +0100 |
Richard Tobin wrote:
>
> In article <45741E2F.BA6C23AB@web.de>,
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
>
> >Property is property, that is to say, it belongs to someone
> >who has the right to exclude others from using it without his or her
> >consent.
> >
> >Intellectual property is property.
>
> So why are you so concerned to find a legal basis to prevent people
> who write software from licensing it as they wish?
http://digital-law-online.info/lpdi1.0/treatise15.html
to begin with.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: gpl licensing, (continued)
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/04
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Richard Tobin, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/03