[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gpl licensing
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: gpl licensing |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Dec 2006 23:03:11 +0100 (CET) |
> Erm, not really. It is not a legal term at all.
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_property>
Define law does not Wikipedia, says the wise man.
> The legal terms that embody the coctail known as "Intellectual property"
> don't even have anything to do with art.
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technical_terminology>
Define law does not Wikipedia, says the wise man.
- Re: gpl licensing, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/12/05
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/05
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/06
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/12/06
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/06
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/06
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/04
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Richard Tobin, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/03