[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL question
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: GPL question |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 01:43:24 +0100 (CET) |
What I glean is, yes i can, from the user's perspective, "include"
a GPL'd software within my own proprietary software, and NOT be
forced to release my source code? (see previous for what i mean by
"include")
As John said, you cannot be forced; either you accept the GPL or you
don't, it is entierly up to you. From the sound of it, you are not
really `including' GPL software with proprietary software, but
distributing it beside it. This is called aggregation, and is
allowed.
Section 2:
| In addition, mere aggregation of another work not based on the
| Program with the Program (or with a work based on the Program) on a
| volume of a storage or distribution medium does not bring the other
| work under the scope of this License.
And section 5:
| 5. You are not required to accept this License, since you have not
| signed it. However, nothing else grants you permission to modify
| or distribute the Program or its derivative works. These actions
| are prohibited by law if you do not accept this License.
| Therefore, by modifying or distributing the Program (or any work
| based on the Program), you indicate your acceptance of this
| License to do so, and all its terms and conditions for copying,
| distributing or modifying the Program or works based on it.
Re: GPL question, me, 2007/03/10
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/03/10
- Re: GPL question, me, 2007/03/12
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/03/13
- Re: GPL question, me, 2007/03/13
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/03/13
- Re: GPL question,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/03/14
Re: GPL question, David Kastrup, 2007/03/13
Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/03/14
Re: GPL question, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/03/10