[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL: Does a conveyor's violation result in rights to users?
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: GPL: Does a conveyor's violation result in rights to users? |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:54:12 +0200 (CEST) |
GPL: Does a conveyor's violation result in rights to users?
E.g. Assume a user receives a binary-only copy of the firmware bundled
with a hardware device based on a GPL'd OS (no source or offer of
source is provided).
A copyriight violation, see Section 3 of the GNU GPL.
Does the GPL give the user the right (or for
other reasons does the user now have the right) to provide or obtain
newer versions of the GPL'd firmware that the vendor sells (e.g. to or
from another client)? i.e. does it give anyone holding a binary copy
the right to distribute it for free to users denied the source that is
their right to receive? From a moral standpoint, it's well-
justified,
On the contrary, from a moral stand point it is not justified. The
user is being deprived of the right to study the program. You cannot
distribute a binary without also allowing the user to recive the
source code; see section 3 of the GNU GPL.
Anyone aware of discussion as to whether the GPLv3 should (or could)
make a user entitled to do this?
The GPLv3 will, as the GPLv2 expressly not allow it, since it is just
distirbuting non-free software, and this is wrong.
Message not available