[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU License, Again
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: GNU License, Again |
Date: |
Mon, 21 May 2007 22:18:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
mike3 <mike4ty4@yahoo.com> writes:
> So then if I do NOT own the GPL program, but make it a vital unique-
> functionality component, however I do NOT distribute it (the GPL
> program, not the non-GPL one) in a non-GPL way and only distribute
> the NON-GPL components of the program (ie. the ORIGINAL) ones in the
> non-GPL way (since I own it I can do whatever the heck I please),
> then it is still OK, since I'm still not trying to take over or
> restrict the GPL program and the GPL program is still being
> distributed for free.
That's not the letter of the GPL you are obeying, but some fuzzy
notion of yours. The problem here is contributory infringement: the
infringement is _planned_ and _prepared_ by you with the end-assembly
to be done in a mechanical way by the customer as your agent.
It does not matter _where_ the customer will get his GPL source to do
this step. _If_ the customer manages to get a copy from the copyright
holder under a more permissive license, there actually will not even
be an infringement.
Can you explain plausibly to the court that you could reasonably have
expected the customer to bargain for a copy of the GPLed software
under a different license?
If you can, you are off the hook, and only your customer may be in a
mess (depending on just what he did with the combined code).
> If this is still not permitted, why not? What would be the rationale
> for making the license that way? It does not seem to be to preserve
> the freeness of the GPLed code, since the above scenario would still
> keep it free, after all.
The GPL is intended to guarantee the freedom of the code itself _and_
descendants.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: GNU License, Again, (continued)
- Re: GNU License, Again, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Paolo Gianrossi, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/22
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/22
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/05/23
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, John Hasler, 2007/05/23
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/23
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/22
Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/22
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/22
Message not availableRe: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/22
Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/22
Re: GNU License, Again, John Hasler, 2007/05/22