[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU License, Again
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: GNU License, Again |
Date: |
Tue, 22 May 2007 10:07:24 +0200 (CEST) |
> But what is the _rationale_ for this, then? What is the _rationale_
> for you not being allowed to separately distribute the portion that
> is entirely yours (ie. that you made)?
You can separately distribute the portion, but it has to be under
compatible terms (preferably the same) since the only effective form for
your work to, well, work is to have the combined form.
Actually, it has always to be under the exact same terms. The GPL
explicitly states that the whole work must be under the same terms as
this [the GPL] license.
- Re: GNU License, Again, (continued)
- Re: GNU License, Again, none, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again, John Hasler, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again, John Hasler, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again, John Hasler, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: GNU License, Again, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/05/22
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/05/22
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Paolo Gianrossi, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/22
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/22
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/05/23