[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof? |
Date: |
Thu, 24 May 2007 20:02:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@gnu.org> writes:
> Dear open-source-fellows,
>
> Please do not confuse us with this movement, we are part of the Free
> software movement, and promote freedom.
Please do not confuse yourself with every reader of this list. Speak
for yourself, not for others. If you absolutely feel compelled to
speak for others, don't use the all-inclusive "we" but specify the
group that you feel qualified speaking for explicitly.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?, Hendrik Belitz, 2007/05/24
- Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/24
- Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?,
David Kastrup <=
- Message not available
- Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?, David Kastrup, 2007/05/24
- Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?, David Kastrup, 2007/05/24
- Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?, Hendrik Belitz, 2007/05/25
- Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/25
- Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/25