[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?
|
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
|
Subject: |
Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 25 May 2007 01:25:40 +0200 |
Again, you resort to petty insults, and spreading misinformation.
Nobody claimed anything about everybody, maybe English isn't a
language you are proficient in--which is perfectly fine--but "us" does
not refer to everyone.
- Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?, Hendrik Belitz, 2007/05/24
- Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/24
- Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?, David Kastrup, 2007/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?, David Kastrup, 2007/05/24
- Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?, David Kastrup, 2007/05/24
- Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Message not available
- Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?, Hendrik Belitz, 2007/05/25
- Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/25
- Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/25
- Message not available
- Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?, David Kastrup, 2007/05/24
- Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?, David Kastrup, 2007/05/24
- Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?, John Hasler, 2007/05/24