[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU License, Again
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: GNU License, Again |
Date: |
Fri, 25 May 2007 01:43:33 +0200 |
You can reduce it to a semantic debate. But in the end the GPL is
structured so that the only legal way for you to redistribute
modified copies of GPL licensed code is to license the
modifications under the GPL.
There are several ways to come into compliance, this is one of them.
Requesting the copyright holder to change the license is another. And
a third is simply not using the GPL program.
- Re: GNU License, Again, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/24
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/25
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/25
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/25
- Re: GNU License, Again, none, 2007/05/24
- Re: GNU License, Again, none, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/24
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, none, 2007/05/24
- Re: GNU License, Again,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, none, 2007/05/24
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/24
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/25
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/25
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/25
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/25
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/26