[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: Lost in licensing - is the following strategy water-proof?
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 12:24:51 +0200

Hendrik Belitz wrote:
> Nevertheless, thanks to you guys who provided me with some useful
> answers. Alexander, your link was pretty informative, but the author
> also states several times that he is not quite sure whether his
> viewpoint on software combinations is fully correct w.r.t. the GNU
> licensing policy. 

That's because the GNU licensing policy is basically

     what's yours is ours, what's mine is mine, would you please
     fill out the copyright assignment form vielen Dank.

>                    I also read through the GPL FAQ behind the link

Read also

> provided to me by Alfred, which was also rather interesting and
> assisted me in deciding whether to use LGPL or BSD licensing in my
> particular case. I think I'll stick to the BSD mod-3-term then...

I suggest you stick to the AFL[1] or Lucent Public License[2], then. 






This message is brought to you courtesy of the Anti-GNU Imperium.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]