|
From: | Lee Hollaar |
Subject: | Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- "Microsoft Patents FUD Report: Who is Actually Slinging it?" |
Date: | Fri, 25 May 2007 08:53:15 -0600 (MDT) |
In article <C6ednSpqgZMqcsvbnZ2dnUVZ_uSgnZ2d@insightbb.com> rjack <rjack@ixwebhosting.com> writes: > What is utterly laughable is the fact that a purported copyright >license like the GPL3 *cannot* effect matters concerning patents. If >source code implements a patentable idea then the source code in >quenstion cannot be copyrighted: That statement is completely wrong.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |