Re: GNU License, Again

[mike3]

On May 25, 3:46 pm, "Alfred M. Szmidt" <a...@gnu.org> wrote:
>    > It does not _cause_ anything, it cannot.  And "make" means
>    > "create".
>
>    Well it requires one to make their code free if they want to use the
>    free code. How about that? That's what I have been trying to say!
>
> Again, this has been explained before.
>
>    How is A still not free even if A is released under a free license
>    by the same person who authored C while C is not? A does not depend
>    on B, B depends on A, by the way.
>
> This has been explained over and over again to you, please refer to
> past message, articles on the GNU project web pages, etc.
>
> You are simply restating questions that have been answered before,
> trying to get a answer that you want, but that answer is not the true
> answer.

Becuase the answers you give about "keeping free code free" did not
make logical sense since _more_ code becomes free when you release
a combined work under the GPL. And I haven't quite found an answer to
_this specific_ question.