[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: GNU FUD
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 15:02:17 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux)

Alexander Terekhov <> writes:

> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> By the way: I agree with your assessment of Alexander being an avid
>> observer of what you call "Intellectual Property law" (there is
>> actually no such thing, as there are disparate laws about the items
>> grouped under this term).  The problem is that he is completely unable
>> to draw any reasonable conclusions from his observations: his
>> predictions are consistently utterly wrong, and he blames this on
>> "drunk judges" and similar excuses.
> Do you really want to me post Easterbrook's summary of the GPL (his
> "quick look" on Wallace's claim aside for a moment) once again?
> I seem to recall that you *agreed* that Easterbrook was indeed
> "drunken" at least regarding his ability to comprehend the GPL.

Your recollections are rather colorful.  I am rather certain that I
said no such thing.  I might have differed in details with his
assessment and reasoning which is not all too surprising.  The bottom
line, however, seems to match pretty much what I would have expected.

David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]