[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: glibc and the Linux libc fork

From: Ciaran O'Riordan
Subject: Re: glibc and the Linux libc fork
Date: 19 Jun 2007 17:52:44 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4

FSF worked on various features, including but not limited to, Hurd support.

Drepper's only accusation is that FSF didn't work on Linux-kernel specific
stuff - as if they had an obligation to do so.  FSF may even have realised
that others would do this work, and so it was more right for them to focus
their resources on doing work that others wouldn't do.  So even if Drepper's
right (and there's not much more than his word to say he is), then that's
not a big accusation.

Alexander Terekhov <> writes:
> : Stallman threatened me and 
> : tried to force me to

Harrowing, but this unsubstantiated accusation came to nothing.

CiarĂ¡n O'Riordan __________________ \ _________ \  GPLv3 and other work supported by \   Fellowship:

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]