[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another GNU License Question
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Another GNU License Question |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Aug 2007 09:24:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
mike3 <mike4ty4@yahoo.com> writes:
> What exactly then is being said in the quoted passage?
It defines "internal use", the situation where no distribution occurs.
For example, if you made a lot of changes to a GPL program by
inserting a bunch of private material, and then something breaks and
you hire a programmer to fix it. This programmer does not have the
right to distribute your modified program to the world under the terms
of the GPL.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Another GNU License Question, mike3, 2007/08/11
- Re: Another GNU License Question, John Hasler, 2007/08/11
- Re: Another GNU License Question, mike3, 2007/08/12
- Re: Another GNU License Question,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Another GNU License Question, mike3, 2007/08/12
- Re: Another GNU License Question, David Kastrup, 2007/08/12
- Re: Another GNU License Question, mike3, 2007/08/12
- Re: Another GNU License Question, John Hasler, 2007/08/13
- Re: Another GNU License Question, mike3, 2007/08/20
- Re: Another GNU License Question, none, 2007/08/20
- Re: Another GNU License Question, mike3, 2007/08/26
- Re: Another GNU License Question, John Hasler, 2007/08/20
- Re: Another GNU License Question, mike3, 2007/08/26
- Re: Another GNU License Question, David Kastrup, 2007/08/14