[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL question
|
From: |
mike3 |
|
Subject: |
Re: GPL question |
|
Date: |
Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:30:35 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Oct 13, 6:44 pm, Mike Cox <mikecox_li...@yahoo.com> wrote:
<snip>
> Possibly, just like a dozen other such projects I found during
> my research. But most probably aren't knowingly violating the
> GPL, it's just the GPL is way too complicated.
>
So why not make a _clear and simple_ free-software license?
- Re: GPL question, (continued)
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/10/17
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/10/18
- Re: GPL question, rjack, 2007/10/18
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/10/18
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/10/18
- Re: GPL question, rjack, 2007/10/19
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/10/20
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/10/24
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/10/17
- Re: GPL question, Mike Cox, 2007/10/17
- Re: GPL question,
mike3 <=
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/10/14
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/10/17
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/10/17
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/10/17
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/10/12
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/10/12
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/10/12
Re: GPL question, n . torrey . pines, 2007/10/19