[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU/Linux Naming
From: |
Noah Slater |
Subject: |
Re: GNU/Linux Naming |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Dec 2007 11:25:23 +0000 |
On 06/12/2007, Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> wrote:
> Is there a widely agreed-upon meaning of the phrase "operating
> system"?
Yes, the POSIX specifications layout exactly this definition.
> Is the kernel considered part of the operating system?
Very much so, along with a C library, a shell and user space tools.
--
Noah Slater <http://bytesexual.org/>
"Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so
far as society is free to use the results." - R. Stallman
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Keith Thompson, 2007/12/10
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/10
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/12/10
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/12/08
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, mike3, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, David Kastrup, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/09
Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/05
Message not available
Re: GNU/Linux Naming, John Hasler, 2007/12/06
Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/06
Re: GNU/Linux Naming, John Hasler, 2007/12/06
Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/06
Re: GNU/Linux Naming, John Hasler, 2007/12/06
Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/12/06
Message not availableRe: GNU/Linux Naming, Keith Thompson, 2007/12/06
Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/07