gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Original code


From: rjack
Subject: Re: Original code
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:24:24 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)

Alexander Terekhov wrote:
rjack wrote:
In the ongoing BusyBox GPL lawsuit with Verizon, the
plaintiffs Rob Landley and Erik Andersen
must identify the specific source code in which *they*
claim ownership as the original authors. Does anyone have
any idea which source code is actually the plaintiffs sole
original work? The BusyBox site http://www.busybox.net/

Aren't they supposed to have the copyight(s) registered prior to filing
the suit?

I've just checked http://www.copyright.gov/records and it doesn't seem
to have anything from Rob Landley and/or Erik Andersen.

Hmmm.

regards,
alexander.

--
"Plaintiffs’ copyrights are unique and valuable property whose market
value is impossible to assess"

                             -- SOFTWARE FREEDOM LAW CENTER, INC.

Yup.

From the United states Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit where the suit is filed:

"It provides that “no action for infringement of the copyright in any United States work shall be instituted until pre-registration or registration of the copyright claim has been made in accordance with this title.” 17 U.S.C. sec. 411(a); see also 17 U.S.C. sec. 501.1 Whether this requirement is jurisdictional is not up for debate in this Circuit. On two recent occasions, we have squarely held that it is."; In re Literary Works in Electronic Databases Copyright Litigation; Nos. 05-5943-cv(L), 06-0223-cv(CON)(2d Cir. Nov. 29, 2007).

Ouuuuuch!!!! No jurisdiction -- automatic dismissal.

Sincerely,
Rjack :)


-- "Standing involves two distinct inquiries. First, an Article III federal court must ask whether a plaintiff has suffered sufficient injury to satisfy the "case or controversy" requirement of Article III ... Second, if a plaintiff has suffered sufficient injury to satisfy Article III, a federal court must ask whether a statute has conferred "standing" on that plaintiff."; Cetacean Community v. Bush, 386 F.3d 1169 (United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2004) --






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]