[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Dismissal with prejudice is normal

From: Rick
Subject: Re: Dismissal with prejudice is normal
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:46:34 -0500
User-agent: Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black)

On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:19:07 +0200, Alexander Terekhov wrote:

> Tim Smith wrote:
>> In article <>,
>>  rjack <> wrote:
>> > It is most plausible that the defendants simply said to the SFLC,
>> > "Dismiss or we will file a Rule 12 Motion to Dismiss" and collect our
>> > attorney fees and costs. Even an incompetent defense attorney would
>> > know that the SFLC pleadings are defective on their face due to lack
>> > of Copyright Office registration of the allegedly infringed works.
>> > The lack of a public settlement stipulation by both parties
>> > reinforces this scenario.
>> Yet the source then appeared, which is what SFLC wanted.
> Verizon offers Busybox object code for downloading on its own web site.
> Don't you think that this means Verizon must provide access to the
> corresponding Busybox source code apart from Actiontec? What happens if
> Actiontec goes out of business tomorrow?
The source should still be available.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]