[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Attorney fees

From: Tim Smith
Subject: Re: Attorney fees
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 18:57:04 -0700
User-agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b2 (Intel Mac OS X)

In article <85r69yn39n.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>, David Kastrup <> 
> > Under that analysis, P expected to make $0 off of D's use of the
> > software, so I don't think it is likely the court would award much
> > more than that.
> Uh, under that analysis, D is still expected to comply with the license
> conditions.  So the court would tell D to comply.  But it would be a
> strange court that told P he should expect to hold up his part of the
> deal (the $0 part) while D can be excused from compliance with his part.
> I mean, get real.

Who said D would be excused from compliance?  I sure didn't.

If P prevails, D will be ordered to stop infringing.

--Tim Smith

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]