[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Attorney fees

From: Hyman Rosen
Subject: Re: Attorney fees
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 01:20:41 -0400
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20080421)

rjack wrote:
If the SFLC is actually settling these frivolous actions as their self-serving blog statements claim, then let them present their evidence. It's put-up or shut-up time for the SFLC. It is their burden of proof.

It's pretty simple, actually. Just demonstrate a case where someone
is distributing binaries derived from GPLed code without the source
being available. Terekhov will no doubt point to Verizon/Actiontec,
but in that case the source is available from someone who has a
business relationship with Verizon, so it would be difficult to attack
Verizon on the fine details of the GPL. Can you find any example where
the SFLC dropped a case and the source code for the programs in dispute
was not made available?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]