[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Attorney fees
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Attorney fees |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:11:07 +0200 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> default copyright provisions. Or b) GPL applies to me. Then the case
> is about checking off whether the conditions are met. Again, this is
> not about the validity of the GPL as such but about specific terms of
> it.
>
> And the cases we had up to now were so clearly lost on option b) that
Why don't you quote ratio decidendi of some case where defendant lost on
option b?
Stop hallucinating, GNUtian dak.
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: Attorney fees, (continued)
- Re: Attorney fees, John Hasler, 2008/07/13
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, John Hasler, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, rjack, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, David Kastrup, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, rjack, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/15