[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Attorney fees

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: Attorney fees
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:42:40 +0200

Hyman Rosen wrote:

[... GPL invalidity ...]

> That paper is a link to a critique of the decision,
> not to a court decision. The court decision held that
> without accepting the GPL, there is no other right to
> distribute. Until an actual other case or appeal finds
> differently, the decision stands, regardless of whether
> or not some commenting judge likes it, and the GPL is
> legal and distribution of GPLed software is an implicit
> agreement to the license.

Suppose that the GPLv4 will include a "condition" to make available not
only the source code but also a bunch of child pornography photos.
According to drunken bavarian judges from district court Munich I
(senselessly parroting bizarre "legal construction" offered by Welte's
attorneys from, not making available child pornography would
then result in copyright liability just like not making available source
code. Utter idiots. Just like you, Hyman.


(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]