[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LGPL vs. GPL
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: LGPL vs. GPL |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:10:34 +0200 |
JohnF wrote:
[...]
> > You've probably read this, but just in case:
> > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html
> >
> > Hope that helps.
>
> Thanks, Ciaran, for the discussion and very useful information.
Now read
http://www.usfca.edu/law/determann/softwarecombinations060403.pdf
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- LGPL vs. GPL, JohnF, 2008/07/20
- Re: LGPL vs. GPL, Ciaran O'Riordan, 2008/07/20
- Message not available
- Re: LGPL vs. GPL, JohnF, 2008/07/20
- Re: LGPL vs. GPL,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- softwarecombinations paper Re: LGPL vs. GPL, Ciaran O'Riordan, 2008/07/21
- Message not available
- Re: softwarecombinations paper Re: LGPL vs. GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/21
- Re: softwarecombinations paper Re: LGPL vs. GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/21
- Re: softwarecombinations paper Re: LGPL vs. GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/21
- Re: softwarecombinations paper Re: LGPL vs. GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/21
- Re: softwarecombinations paper Re: LGPL vs. GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/21
- Re: softwarecombinations paper Re: LGPL vs. GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/21
- Message not available
- Re: softwarecombinations paper Re: LGPL vs. GPL, Tim Smith, 2008/07/21
- Re: LGPL vs. GPL, JohnF, 2008/07/30
- Re: LGPL vs. GPL, Ciaran O'Riordan, 2008/07/31