Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- "A telling admission" by Aaron Williamson (AW1337)

[Hyman Rosen]

rjack wrote:
> The S.F.L.C. attorneys are *consistent* and we may *always*
> count on them. They have filed six consecutive incompetent
> pleadings in the Southern District of New York.

In any of these cases, is there an instance where the
source code of the GPLed software was not available
once the case was over? If not, then the SFLC has done
its work successfully.

Over and over again, you appear to miss the point of a
lawsuit. It is to achieve an objective. That objective
is to make distributors of GPLed software comply with
the requirements of the license. After each suit filed
by the SFLC, this has happened.