Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- "A telling admission" by Aaron Williamson (AW1337)

[Linonut]

* Hyman Rosen peremptorily fired off this memo:

> rjack wrote:
>> The S.F.L.C. attorneys are *consistent* and we may *always*
> > count on them. They have filed six consecutive incompetent
>> pleadings in the Southern District of New York.
>
> In any of these cases, is there an instance where the
> source code of the GPLed software was not available
> once the case was over? If not, then the SFLC has done
> its work successfully.
>
> Over and over again, you appear to miss the point of a
> lawsuit. It is to achieve an objective. That objective
> is to make distributors of GPLed software comply with
> the requirements of the license. After each suit filed
> by the SFLC, this has happened.

rjack is wearing green-colored glasses.

-- 
"How many boxes will it sell?"
                -- Hypothetical discussion in a Microsoft feature team