[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record

From: thufir
Subject: Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:44:42 GMT
User-agent: Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black)

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:31:50 -0400, Hyman Rosen wrote:

> I guess that the plaintiffs decided that having the manufacturer of the
> routers comply with the GPL was good enough for them, because it would
> be difficult to explain in court that Verizon was not complying with the
> GPL given this availability. But that's just a guess.

If it's an action tek router, sold to an importer exporter, and then to 
another middleman, and then to a retailer, to whom do you go for the 
source code?  presumably, just action tek.

Dunno if that totally applies here, but seems reasonable.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]