Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- "A telling admission" by AaronWilliamson(AW1337)

[Hyman Rosen]

Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> "[I]mplicit in a nonexclusive license"

These court decisions about nonexclusive licenses have been
about implied licenses, not written ones, except for the
recent Jacobsen v. Katzer case. (Which is therefore being
appealed and criticized, but I will take my own advice and
say that as long as it's not overruled, it's the way it is,
so you're right for now.)