[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:35:41 +0200

"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote:
> The SFLC would actually be a even more profitable business if the GPL
> was unenforacble, they would sue anyone who distributes GPL software,
> since if the license is indeed invalid, you fall back on default
> copyright law, which is very restrictive.

You misread "invalid" to your advantage. Think about it for a minute,
ueber GNUtian ams.

Ready now?

Here's breaking news: "invalid" means that your invalid *demands* (not
permissions) are void, and the rest is just fine.


(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]