Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record

[Alexander Terekhov]

David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> I mean, while we are in the "who can come up with the silliest
> irrelevant hypothetical" contest, this entry seems as good as any.

No. We are in "enforcing invalid license contracts" episode. You seem to
suggest that it would require "a three-headed fire-breathing dragon".
That doesn't sound good or assuring for the GPL, GNUtian dak.

regards,
alexander.

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)