[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PJ of Groklaw tells a story... (celebrating CAFC's utter nonsense ru
Re: PJ of Groklaw tells a story... (celebrating CAFC's utter nonsense ruling)
Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:57:52 -0400
Thunderbird 220.127.116.11 (Windows/20080708)
David Kastrup wrote:
thufir <email@example.com> writes:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:43:48 -0400, Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
No doubt Eben Moglen is somewhat of a strange duck, but I'm not sure
what you mean by "their powerful motivation, ieJ and Moglen"
Do either of them have a vested interest in this, financial or otherwise
or is this just a matter of winning an argument/making a point?
I'm not sure what you're getting at, but I would say that "making a
point" is an example of a vested interest.
In the case of rjack, "bested interest" would be more fitting.
The woodwork's just full of 'em today!
"Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 411(a) as well as its predecessor, § 13, it has
been held repeatedly that ownership of a copyright registration is a
jurisidictional prerequisite to an action for infringement. . . . A
complaint which fails to plead compliance with § 411(a) is defective and
subject to dismissal."; Techniques, Inc. v. Rohn, 592 F.Supp. 1195,
1197; 225 U.S.P.Q. 741 (S.D.N.Y. 1984)