[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PJ of Groklaw tells a story... (celebrating CAFC's utter nonsense ru

From: Rjack
Subject: Re: PJ of Groklaw tells a story... (celebrating CAFC's utter nonsense ruling)
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:57:52 -0400
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20080708)

David Kastrup wrote:
thufir <> writes:

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:43:48 -0400, Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:

No doubt Eben Moglen is somewhat of a strange duck, but I'm not sure
what you mean by "their powerful motivation, ieJ and Moglen"

Do either of them have a vested interest in this, financial or otherwise
or is this just a matter of winning an argument/making a point?

I'm not sure what you're getting at, but I would say that "making a point" is an example of a vested interest.

In the case of rjack, "bested interest" would be more fitting.

The woodwork's just full of 'em today!


"Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 411(a) as well as its predecessor, § 13, it has been held repeatedly that ownership of a copyright registration is a jurisidictional prerequisite to an action for infringement. . . . A complaint which fails to plead compliance with § 411(a) is defective and subject to dismissal."; Techniques, Inc. v. Rohn, 592 F.Supp. 1195, 1197; 225 U.S.P.Q. 741 (S.D.N.Y. 1984)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]