Re: The GPL dream is finally over!

[Rjack]

David Kastrup wrote:
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:

> I repeat: in legal matters, the decisions of the courts, not the 
> commentators, count, regardless how silly you and isolated
> commentators may consider them.

David, that must then be your opinion of:

"[A] condition precedent is a condition precedent to performance
under the contract, not formation of the contract. When a
condition precedent is not satisfied, it relieves a party to the
contract of the obligation to perform. It does not negate the
existence of the contract or the binding contractual relationship
of the parties."; Moratzka v. United States (In re Matthieson),
63 B.R. 56, 60 (D.Minn.1986)

I'm so glad you've finally come around to Alexander's point of view!

Sincerely,
Rjack

            -- It's never to late for redemption. --