[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT
From: |
Tim Smith |
Subject: |
Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Sep 2008 14:01:54 -0700 |
User-agent: |
MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b2 (Intel Mac OS X) |
In article <W1xyk.224$QC1.173@fe109.usenetserver.com>,
Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> wrote:
> Rjack wrote:
> > 2) Lot's of embarrassment and a red face for the federal magistrate
> > when the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit kicks his ass for
> > entering a default judgment in a case that he clearly had no subject
> > matter jurisdiction to hear.
>
> Yeah, there's lots of mockery of judges here. But so far the only
> appeal we've seen has been in the JMRI case, and that went in favor
> of the GPL. I suggest you look behind you - the ass that's being
> kicked is yours.
The JMRI case is completely irrelevant to the BusyBox cases, because the
JMRI copyrights are all registered. They readily show up if you search
the copyright registration database. Not so for the BusyBox copyrights.
--
--Tim Smith
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, (continued)
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/09/12
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/12
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/09/12
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/12
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/09/12
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/12
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/09/12
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/12
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Rjack, 2008/09/12
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, chrisv, 2008/09/13
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT,
Tim Smith <=
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Rahul Dhesi, 2008/09/14
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Tim Smith, 2008/09/14
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Rahul Dhesi, 2008/09/14
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Tim Smith, 2008/09/14
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Rahul Dhesi, 2008/09/14
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Ben Pfaff, 2008/09/14
- Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Tim Smith, 2008/09/15
Re: softwarefreedom.org and busybox fellows 'win' DEFAULT JUDGMENT, Rahul Dhesi, 2008/09/13